March 2nd 2020

Screen Shot 2021-03-02 at 12.01.59.png

CIA organised fake vaccination drive to get Osama bin Laden's family DNA

In 2011 the CIA used a fake Hepatitis B children’s mass vaccination programme to illegally collect DNA for intelligence purposes in the hunt for Bin Laden. Such was the outrage that the discovery of this fake vaccine programme provoked an alliance of 200 US aid groups to write to the then head of the CIA David Petraeus in protest, linking the agency’s behaviour to the ongoing polio crisis in Pakistan.

“I have been injected against my will, while in jail in Egypt. To this day I do not know what they put inside my body. Any sort of state coercion on the issue — up to and including compulsory vaccination — fills me with horror”


February 9th 2021

Bizarre statement in Time Magazine that leads to censorship

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

“a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”

Read full report here


Time Magazine has just published an opinion piece of the US Election. But in a bizarre and sinister twist, publishing the following section will see your social media account - and you -deleted.

“a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”

“They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.” A truly bizarre claim. Political Commentator Tim Cast published the section on his Twitter account last week and the Tweet was immediately locked by the company, preventing any further comments being added and was flagged with the sinister warning “This claim of election fraud is disputed, and this Tweet can’t be replied to, Retweeted or liked due to a risk of violence”.

”A risk of violence”? For publishing a quote from an article?

If you remember the internet ‘dress’ conundrum from a few years ago this will be familiar territory. Was the dress white and gold or blue and black? It appeared that two people could see two different colours depending on various personal psychological factors, neither was right or wrong. The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election seems to have the same effect. If you believe the election was rigged (or fortified) you will see this article as a brazen admission of guilt. If you believe the election was fair, you will see an honest account of why it was.

Time to debate the article right? Wrong. Unlike the ‘dress’ paradox, if you debate the Time article in the wrong way, your social media account will be blocked, suspended or restricted. If you debate the article in the right way, you will be ratio’d, boosted and generally encouraged on social media.

This is propaganda. Psychological manipulation of opinion (truth?) by association. Mention this in the wrong way and you will be labelled Qanon/Far Right/White Supremacist. The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election is a weaponised report designed to spark anger and create debate with the sole purpose of ‘exposing’ the insurrectionists, the enemy and the wrong thinkers for further culling.

Unlike The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election, the dress was allowed debate and analysis and examination. It wasn’t controversial. It wasn’t ‘two colours at once’. It relied on complex neuroscience and some basic digital manipulation to fool half the people, to seek vulnerabilities within their character, within their perception of reality, to mislead them, to cause controversy, to discredit people who see truth. To instruct their brain to lie to them.

Except with the dress, if you stumbled across the right answer, you weren’t deleted from society.

FACT: The dress was blue and black. Here is the original dress: https://www.romanoriginals.co.uk/thedress